Search found 6 matches
- 12 Mar 2015, 17:45
- Forum: Working with RailModeller Pro
- Topic: Working with Shapes
- Replies: 10
- Views: 81327
Re: Working with Shapes
Move element to back doesn't work with shapes.
- 21 Feb 2015, 15:47
- Forum: Working with RailModeller Pro
- Topic: THIS PRODUCT IS NOT READY!
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4509
Re: THIS PRODUCT IS NOT READY!
Thank You, but a refund is not necessary, or desired. I believe Railmodeller 4, "Classic", to be an excellent product and I fully expect this new version to exceed even that, once it is fully developed. I did want to express my displeasure at the premature roll-out of the new product as a ...
- 20 Feb 2015, 17:12
- Forum: Working with RailModeller Pro
- Topic: THIS PRODUCT IS NOT READY!
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4509
THIS PRODUCT IS NOT READY!
When the answer to most comments regarding missing features, which are currently available in the "Classic" version, is that "they are coming soon", THE PRODUCT IS NOT READY. As another commenter suggested, you are forcing/tricking users into providing your beta testing, AND CHAR...
- 20 Feb 2015, 16:58
- Forum: Working with RailModeller Pro
- Topic: Moving elements?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2237
Moving elements?
First off, 5.0.4 is a great improvement in usability, Thank you. I've opened a recent version 4 layout in 5 and the elements seem to be randomly scattered amongst "levels". I have several rectangle shapes, representing benchwork which mask most but not all elements. Moving these bench work...
- 04 Feb 2015, 16:55
- Forum: Working with RailModeller Pro
- Topic: Difference Pro vs Classic
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10452
Re: Difference Pro vs Classic
I find the new version to be vastly inferior. Many usability features such as key stroke ability to duplicate track sections do not appear to exist. I find this version too frustrating to explore. Please continue to support the original version.
- 04 Feb 2015, 16:50
- Forum: Working with RailModeller Pro
- Topic: Floating Panels
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4082
Re: Floating Panels
poor design decision. Lack of floating panels is quite impacting. Please correct.