Search found 6 matches
- Thu 12. Mar 2015, 17:45
- Forum: Working with RailModeller Pro
- Topic: Working with Shapes
- Replies: 10
- Views: 79311
Re: Working with Shapes
Move element to back doesn't work with shapes.
- Sat 21. Feb 2015, 15:47
- Forum: Working with RailModeller Pro
- Topic: THIS PRODUCT IS NOT READY!
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3303
Re: THIS PRODUCT IS NOT READY!
Thank You, but a refund is not necessary, or desired. I believe Railmodeller 4, "Classic", to be an excellent product and I fully expect this new version to exceed even that, once it is fully developed. I did want to express my displeasure at the premature roll-out of the new product as a not fully ...
- Fri 20. Feb 2015, 17:12
- Forum: Working with RailModeller Pro
- Topic: THIS PRODUCT IS NOT READY!
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3303
THIS PRODUCT IS NOT READY!
When the answer to most comments regarding missing features, which are currently available in the "Classic" version, is that "they are coming soon", THE PRODUCT IS NOT READY. As another commenter suggested, you are forcing/tricking users into providing your beta testing, AND CHARGING US FOR THE "pri...
- Fri 20. Feb 2015, 16:58
- Forum: Working with RailModeller Pro
- Topic: Moving elements?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1690
Moving elements?
First off, 5.0.4 is a great improvement in usability, Thank you. I've opened a recent version 4 layout in 5 and the elements seem to be randomly scattered amongst "levels". I have several rectangle shapes, representing benchwork which mask most but not all elements. Moving these bench work elements ...
- Wed 4. Feb 2015, 16:55
- Forum: Working with RailModeller Pro
- Topic: Difference Pro vs Classic
- Replies: 10
- Views: 8803
Re: Difference Pro vs Classic
I find the new version to be vastly inferior. Many usability features such as key stroke ability to duplicate track sections do not appear to exist. I find this version too frustrating to explore. Please continue to support the original version.
- Wed 4. Feb 2015, 16:50
- Forum: Working with RailModeller Pro
- Topic: Floating Panels
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3035
Re: Floating Panels
poor design decision. Lack of floating panels is quite impacting. Please correct.